• Demand for intermediate goods and raw materials stagnates in July as manufacturers reduced safety-stock building
• Supply shortages remained elevated, leaving production vulnerable to fresh geopolitical shocks
• Asia and North America continued to lead global manufacturing demand, while Europe continues to lag

CLARK, N.J., Aug. 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index — a leading indicator tracking demand conditions, shortages, transportation costs, inventories and backlogs, based on a monthly survey of 27,000 businesses — showed global supply chain pressures eased in July as manufacturers reduced precautionary stockpiling and transportation pressures moderated. However, supply shortages remained elevated and production backlogs continued to build, indicating supply chains had yet to fully recover before the renewed disruption in the Strait of Hormuz.

The survey was mostly conducted before the latest escalation in the Middle East and renewed disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, providing a snapshot of global supply chains immediately before energy prices and geopolitical uncertainty increased again.

Manufacturers scaled back safety-stock building in July following a three-and-a-half-year peak in the second quarter of 2026, suggesting businesses believed supply risks were beginning to ease. Transportation costs also moderated, helping drive the overall improvement in global supply chain conditions.

Despite the easing, reports of critical items in short supply remained elevated globally, while manufacturers continued reporting rising production backlogs caused by missing materials and components. This indicates supply bottlenecks remain unresolved and could worsen if geopolitical tensions persist.

Demand for raw materials and commodities remained strongest across Asia and North America, where manufacturers continued purchasing inputs at a significantly faster pace than other major regions. Europe, by contrast, remained comparatively subdued, reflecting weaker manufacturing order books and lower inventory building.

Interpreting the data:

Index > 0, supply chain capacity is being stretched. The further above 0, the more stretched supply chains are.

Index < 0, supply chain capacity is being underutilized. The further below 0, the more underutilized supply chains are.

JULY 2026 REGIONAL KEY FINDINGS

• ASIA: Index decreased to 1.37, from 1.95, its lowest reading since March. Asian factory purchasing activity slowed sharply in July, driven by China.
  
  
  
  
• NORTH AMERICA: Index fell to 0.76, from 1.17, pointing to a further easing of supply chain pressures faced by North American manufacturers.
  
  
  
  
• EUROPE: Index declines to 0.68, from 1.13, its lowest level since March. Demand for manufacturing inputs shrank further, indicating factory retrenchment across the continent.
  
  
  
  
• U.K.: Sharp reduction in the index to 0.30, from 1.05 as U.K. manufacturers rapidly reduced their procurement activity and ran down their stocks aggressively.

JULY 2026 KEY FINDINGS

• DEMAND: July data indicated a slowdown in factory purchasing volumes. The index's demand component was its weakest in the year-to-date, driven principally by China and, to a lesser extent, the U.S. The data suggest that the stockpiling-driven boost to demand has faded at the start of the third quarter.
  
  
  
  
• INVENTORIES: Reports of global manufacturers stockpiling raw materials and intermediate products due to price or supply concerns fell for the first time since January, indicating that procurement leaders ran down the inventories they had built up since the Middle East war began.
  
  
  
  
• MATERIAL SHORTAGES: The items in short supply indicator fell only fractionally in July, indicating a limited improvement in the availability of critical manufacturing inputs. Overall, supply shortages remained high by historical standards.    
  
  
  
  
• LABOR SHORTAGES: Manufacturers' reports of backlogs rising due to staff shortages remained anchored, signaling that labor was not a hindrance to capacity utilization during July.
  
  
  
  
• TRANSPORTATION: The global transportation cost indicator fell again in July, reaching its lowest level since March. That said, data were principally collected prior to global oil prices surging towards the tail-end of the month.  

For more information, visit www.gep.com/volatility.

Note: Full historical data dating back to January 2005 is available for subscription. Please contact economics@spglobal.com.

The next release of the GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index will be 8 a.m. ET, Sep. 11, 2026.

About the GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index

The GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index is produced by S&P Global and GEP. It is derived from S&P Global's PMI^® surveys, sent to companies in over 40 countries, totaling around 27,000 companies. The headline figure is a weighted sum of six sub-indices derived from PMI data, PMI Comments Trackers and PMI Commodity Price & Supply Indicators compiled by S&P Global.

• A value above 0 indicates that supply chain capacity is being stretched and supply chain volatility is increasing. The further above 0, the greater the extent to which capacity is being stretched.
  
  
  
  
• A value below 0 indicates that supply chain capacity is being underutilized, reducing supply chain volatility. The further below 0, the greater the extent to which capacity is being underutilized.

A Supply Chain Volatility Index is also published at a regional level for Europe, Asia, North America and the U.K. For more information about the methodology, click here.

Media Contacts

Derek Creevey

Director, Public Relations

GEP

Phone: +1 646-276-4579

Email: derek.creevey@gep.com

Joe Hayes

Senior Principal Economist

S&P Global Market Intelligence

Phone: +44-1344-328-099

Email: joe.hayes@spglobal.com

S&P Global Market Intelligence

Corporate Communications

Email: Press.mi@spglobal.com

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/global-supply-chain-pressures-ease-in-july-but-shortages-persist-ahead-of-renewed-strait-of-hormuz-disruption-gep-global-supply-chain-volatility-index-302849802.html

In der Schweiz entscheiden die Stimmbürgerinnen und Stimmbürger am Sonntag über eine weitreichende Begrenzung der Bevölkerungszahl. Zur Abstimmung steht eine Volksinitiative der rechtskonservativen Schweizerischen Volkspartei (SVP), die den Bestand des Landes bis 2050 auf höchstens zehn Millionen Einwohner festschreiben will. Derzeit leben rund 9,1 Millionen Menschen in der Alpenrepublik, darunter etwa 340.000 Deutsche. Die Auszählung der Stimmen beginnt mittags um 12.00 Uhr, Beobachter rechnen mit einem knappen Resultat.

Die SVP, stärkste Kraft im Schweizer Parlament, vermarktet ihren Vorstoß als «Nachhaltigkeitsinitiative». Sie verspricht, mit einer Begrenzung der Zuwanderung Probleme wie Staus auf den Straßen, überfüllte Busse und Bahnen, Wohnungsknappheit, hohe Mieten und steigende Kriminalität in den Griff zu bekommen. Ab einer Schwelle von 9,5 Millionen Einwohnern müsste die Politik nach dem Willen der Initianten konkrete Maßnahmen ergreifen, etwa die Asylvergabe einschränken und den Familiennachzug begrenzen. Nach heutigen Prognosen könnte diese Marke in den 2030er-Jahren erreicht werden.

Reichen diese Einschränkungen nicht aus, sieht die Initiative als weitere Option die Kündigung der vertraglich geregelten Personenfreizügigkeit mit der Europäischen Union vor. Das Abkommen ermöglicht Bürgern aus EU-Staaten bislang einen vergleichsweise einfachen Zugang zum Schweizer Arbeitsmarkt. Eine Aufkündigung hätte nicht nur Konsequenzen für Fachkräfte aus der EU, sondern könnte auch das Verhältnis zum wichtigsten Handelspartner des Landes belasten. Für Deutsche würde ein Ja zur Initiative den Weg zum Arbeiten und Leben in der Schweiz deutlich verkomplizieren.

Bundesrat und Regierungsparteien – mit Ausnahme der SVP – lehnen die Vorlage geschlossen ab. Die Regierung warnt davor, dass ein starrer Bevölkerungsdeckel strukturelle Probleme wie Fachkräftemangel und gesellschaftliche Überalterung nicht löse. Justizminister Beat Jans bezeichnete die Initiative als «leeres Versprechen» und verwies darauf, dass sie neue Unsicherheiten schaffe, ohne die Ursachen von Engpässen auf dem Wohnungs- und Infrastrukturmarkt anzugehen. Umfragen signalisierten lange eine Mehrheit für die Vorlage, zuletzt deutete sich jedoch eine Trendwende an. Angesichts früherer Volksabstimmungen, bei denen die tatsächlichen Ergebnisse zum Teil deutlich von den Erhebungen abwichen, bleibt der Ausgang jedoch offen.